1. Introduction

The financial services sector faces increasing pressure to improve Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting and disclosure (Chopra et al., 2024). Lack of transparency in these areas hinders investor confidence, impedes regulatory compliance, and limits the ability of stakeholders to assess the true sustainability and ethical impact of financial institutions (Kraft et al., 2011).  Integrating sustainability into business strategies, emphasizing transparency and accountability, and setting clear objectives is important for businesses (Chopra et al., 2024). Microsoft Fabric offers a comprehensive solution to address these challenges by providing a unified platform for data integration, analytics, and reporting (Chopra et al., 2024; Li, 2024). By leveraging Fabric’s capabilities, financial institutions can create a Financial Reporting Agent that streamlines ESG data collection, enhances reporting accuracy, and fosters greater transparency in their operations.

2. Theoretical Framework for ESG Reporting

The escalating significance of Environmental, Social, and Governance factors in investment decisions and regulatory frameworks necessitates a robust theoretical framework for ESG reporting (Xia et al., 2023). Organizations are increasingly disclosing financial and non-financial performance as they are becoming more accountable and transparent to the providers of capital and other interested parties (Camilleri, 2019). ESG considerations encompass a wide range of issues, including environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance (Li, 2024). In recent years, ESG reports have become increasingly diverse in terms of topics and perspectives . These elements are becoming essential for evaluating a company’s long-term sustainability and ethical impact (Xia et al., 2023).  A robust ESG reporting framework should integrate key theoretical underpinnings, such as stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and institutional theory, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the motivations and mechanisms driving corporate social responsibility (Camilleri, 2019). ESG reports are perceived as instrumental tools that facilitate a comprehensive understanding. Stakeholder theory posits that organizations have a responsibility to consider the interests of all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the broader community (Liu et al., 2023). Legitimacy theory suggests that organizations seek to maintain legitimacy by aligning their actions with societal expectations and values. Institutional theory highlights the influence of social norms, regulations, and industry practices on organizational behavior. ESG scoring is a method used to quantify the sustainability and societal impact of a company within these three domains: environmental, social, and governance (Liu et al., 2023). By integrating these theoretical perspectives, a Financial Reporting Agent can provide a more holistic and insightful assessment of an organization’s ESG performance.

 Furthermore, the development of integrated reporting, which combines financial and non-financial information, reflects a growing recognition of the interconnectedness between financial performance and ESG factors (Camilleri, 2019). ESG reporting is no longer just a corporate obligation; it is a powerful mechanism driving sustainable development (Chopra et al., 2024).

3. Current State of ESG Reporting in Financial Services

Currently, financial institutions grapple with several challenges in ESG reporting, including a lack of standardized metrics, inconsistent data quality, and fragmented reporting systems.  The absence of universally accepted ESG standards makes it difficult to compare the performance of different organizations and assess their true impact. The environmental domain examines how a company manages its impact on the environment, such as through its carbon footprint, waste management, and natural resource conservation efforts.  Data quality issues, such as incomplete, inaccurate, and inconsistent data, further complicate the reporting process and undermine the reliability of ESG disclosures. Existing reporting systems often operate in silos, making it challenging to integrate ESG data with financial data and gain a holistic view of organizational performance. A problem for past and a challenge for future research is that these ratings show inconsistencies, which depend on the rating agencies’ preferences, weights of the constituting factors, and rating methodology. As a result, investors and other stakeholders often struggle to obtain a clear and accurate picture of an organization’s ESG performance, hindering informed decision-making and impeding the flow of capital towards sustainable investments.

4. Leveraging Microsoft Fabric for ESG Reporting

Microsoft Fabric offers a unified platform for data integration, analytics, and reporting, providing a comprehensive solution to address the challenges of ESG reporting in financial services. Fabric’s data integration capabilities enable organizations to connect to diverse data sources, including internal systems, external databases, and third-party ESG data providers, and bring all the data together in one place (Liu et al., 2023). This unified data foundation ensures data consistency and accuracy, facilitating more reliable ESG reporting. Furthermore, Fabric’s analytics tools, such as Power BI, enable organizations to analyze ESG data, identify trends, and gain insights into their sustainability performance. These insights can be used to inform decision-making, improve ESG performance, and communicate progress to stakeholders. Moreover, Microsoft is also working to promote diversity and inclusion to ensure equal rights and opportunities for employees. Fabric’s reporting capabilities enable organizations to create customized ESG reports that meet the specific needs of different stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and customers.

The platform supports a wide range of reporting formats and visualizations, making it easy to communicate ESG performance in a clear and compelling manner. By leveraging Microsoft Fabric, financial institutions can streamline their ESG reporting processes, improve data quality, and gain valuable insights into their sustainability performance. 

5. Implementing a Fabric-based ESG Reporting Solution

To implement a Fabric-based ESG reporting solution, financial institutions should follow a structured approach that encompasses data collection, data modeling, analytics, and reporting. First, organizations need to identify and collect relevant ESG data from various sources, including internal systems, external databases, and third-party providers. This data should be validated and cleansed to ensure data quality and consistency. Next, organizations should create a data model that integrates ESG data with financial data, providing a holistic view of organizational performance. This model should be designed to support a wide range of analytics and reporting requirements. After the data model is developed, organizations can use Fabric’s analytics tools to analyze ESG data, identify trends, and gain insights into their sustainability performance. 

This includes discussion on various data sources and the selection of ESG indicators, highlighting the role of materiality assessment, and the balance between standardized and customized indicators (Liu et al., 2023). Organizations should also benchmark their performance against industry peers and best practices to identify areas for improvement. 

Finally, organizations can use Fabric’s reporting capabilities to create customized ESG reports that meet the specific needs of different stakeholders. 

6. Improving Transparency and Compliance

The lack of transparent ESG reporting and disclosure in financial services hinders investor confidence and regulatory compliance. The implementation of a Financial Reporting Agent based on Microsoft Fabric can significantly enhance the transparency and comparability of ESG data, fostering greater trust among investors and stakeholders. The new technologies allow the users to customize the contents of financial reports, choose their own assumptions and accounting rules, define the frequency of the report, demand continuous reporting, and the like (Wagenhofer, 2023). By providing a clear and consistent view of ESG performance, financial institutions can attract more sustainable investments and improve their reputation. The integration of Fabric-based reporting solutions also facilitates compliance with evolving ESG regulations and reporting standards. Companies positioning ESG reporting at the core of their operations and strategies can significantly contribute to addressing the world’s most pressing challenges while ensuring their long-term viability (Chopra et al., 2024). By automating the reporting process and ensuring data accuracy, financial institutions can reduce the risk of non-compliance and avoid potential penalties.

7. Conclusion

In conclusion, the lack of transparent ESG reporting and disclosure in financial services poses a significant challenge to investor confidence and regulatory compliance. By embracing a strategic approach to ESG reporting and leveraging the capabilities of Microsoft Fabric, financial institutions can drive sustainable development, enhance their reputation, and create long-term value for stakeholders (Chopra et al., 2024; Ionascu, 2019; Xia et al., 2023).

ESG reports are perceived as instrumental tools that facilitate a comprehensive understanding of th (Xia et al., 2023). By setting clear objectives, emphasizing transparency and accountability, integrating sustainability into business strategies, measuring impacts, engaging with stakeholders, and fostering innovation, businesses can harness the true potential of ESG reporting to create a more sustainable and equitable future for all (Chopra et al., 2024). In doing so, they will become not only contributors to sustainable development but also leaders in the global movement towards a better world (Chopra et al., 2024).

References

Camilleri, M. A. (2019). Theoretical Insights on Integrated Reporting: Valuing the Financial, Social and Sustainability Disclosures. In CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance (p. 61). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01719-4_3

Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. In Sustainability (Vol. 16, Issue 2, p. 606). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606

Ionascu, E. (2019). Towards more transparency in the real estate sector through sustainability reporting. In 25th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference. https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_319

Kraft, M. E., Stephan, M., & Abel, T. D. (2011). Coming Clean. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014953.001.0001

Li, Y. (2024). Microsoft’s Business Model and Strategy Adjustment under ESG Standard. In Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (Vol. 79, Issue 1, p. 327). https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/79/20241746

Liu, Y., Osterrieder, J., Misheva, B. H., Koenigstein, N., & Baals, L. J. (2023). Navigating the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) landscape: constructing a robust and reliable scoring engine – insights into Data Source Selection, Indicator Determination, Weighting and Aggregation Techniques, and Validation Processes for Comprehensive ESG Scoring Systems. In Open Research Europe (Vol. 3, p. 119). European Commission. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16278.1

Wagenhofer, A. (2023). Sustainability Reporting: A Financial Reporting Perspective. In Accounting in Europe (Vol. 21, Issue 1, p. 1). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2218398

Xia, Z., Sun, A., Cai, X., & Zeng, S. (2023). Dynamic Analysis of Corporate ESG Reports: A Model of Evolutionary Trends. In arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2309.07001